Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 13:13 +0100 schrieb Michael Stapelberg: > Hi Benjamin, > > Thanks for working on this. > > > Version : 0.9.581 / 0.4 > Any chance to get jdownloader2?
I have no plans for it. Patches to the downloader script to support jdownloader2 beta are welcome. > > This package contains only a dektop file and a script, which will download > > and > > launch the latest JDownloader. The downloaded files will be stored in > > ~/.jdownloader by default. > I think this is not intuitive. When installing jdownloader, I’d expect > the package to contain the actual, tested source. Especially I’d love to > get rid of jdownloader’s horrible auto-update system. I would love to see a proper jdownloader packaging, too. > Could you instead package jdownloader itself? I tried, but failed miserable. Some libraries needs to be packaged and the upstream build system needs to be bent to build on Debian. I would love to ditch the launcher and replace it with a proper package. This is a lot of work. Until this work is done, I like to have this launcher in the contrib archive. This is suboptimal, but better than nothing. > Or at least rename the package to signal that this is merely an installer? I think the description is clear enough (otherwise improvements are welcome). The package is installer, launcher, and provides desktop integration. If you have a strong opinion to rename the package, can you provide name suggestions? -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1364041753.3474.8.camel@deep-thought
