Hi, Jelmer Vernooij wrote on Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:26:58 +0000: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:43:50PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > Hi José, > > > > You expressed interest in taking over maintenance of bzr-gtk > > almost a year ago. Would you still like to adopt it? > > Since I haven't heard back from Jose, bzr-gtk FTBFS, it has no active > upstream
There seems a newer upstream release, 0.104.0, from April 2012 according to https://launchpad.net/bzr-gtk. Not sure if that would help against the FTBFS -- at least the changelog doesn't seem to mention something in that direction. > and has been owned by the QA team for a while now, I'm going to > request its removal from the archive. I already thought about that, too. From a QA point of view it's probably the best. Since the package bzr-gtk itself is maintained in bzr (according to the still present Vcs-* headers), it would need someone who is familiar with bzr to fix the outstanding issues even if they themselves may not need bzr knowledge. (At least the fact that it's maintained in bzr holds me back from having a closer look.) Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130822111749.ga10...@sym.noone.org
