On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:30:12PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > In the sources, the doc/cilcode.tmp directory looks suspicious. It > contains many .o files. Shouldn't it be removed?
Indeed, I have no idea how it was included but it is (re)generated by make doc so I'll make sure it is removed. > The OCaml library (/usr/lib/ocaml/cil) must be in its own binary package > (libcil-ocaml-dev) with a Provides field, so that reverse dependencies > get their dependencies right. OK. Fedora also uses separate packages for ocaml-cil-doc and ocaml-cil-cilly; is this also required for Debian? > Is is really needed to have cilly.byte AND cilly.native? The perl wrapper script bin/cilly provides a --bytecode flag to invoke the bytecode version. I'm not sure about the historical motivation for this (ocamldebug comes to mind), but I am reluctant to potentially break existing user workflows just for the sake saving 1.3 MB. > Please set the Maintainer field to "Debian OCaml Maintainers <...>" and > move your name to an Uploaders field. OK. I'll let you know when a new version is available. Thanks for your review, -- Gabriel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131009123454.ga4...@kerneis.info