Your message dated Sat, 3 Aug 2002 11:16:32 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line close RFP for gnunet has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2002 06:10:32 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 28 01:10:32 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (wagnolia.lsimmons.net) [63.68.143.76] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17YhGB-0008Ot-00; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 01:10:32 -0500 Received: from lance by wagnolia.lsimmons.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17YhG9-000198-00; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 01:10:29 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 01:10:29 -0500 From: Lance Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RFP: gnunet -- anonymous, distributed, reputation-based network Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.49 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.18-2002-07-13 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-07-28 Severity: wishlist * Package name : gnunet Version : 0.4.3 was released July 27, 2002 Upstream Author : There are several listed on the website * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/GNUnet/ * License : GPL Description : anonymous, distributed, reputation-based network GNUnet is an anonymous, distributed, reputation-based network. A first service implemented on top of the networking layer allows censorship-resistant file-sharing. GNUnet claims to offer significant advantages over "freenet. gnutella, mojonation and others". The requirements listed on the website are: * GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD or NetBSD. * OpenSSL (>= 0.95) * gtk+ >= 1.2 * libextractor (available at http://www.ovmj.org/~samanta/libextractor/) The AUTHORS file in the source tarball contains this passage: > Primary developers (at the moment): > Blake Matheny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Christian Grothoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Krista Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux wagnolia 2.4.18-2002-07-13 #1 SMP Sat Jul 13 17:13:25 CDT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- no debconf information -- .~. /V\ Lance Simmons /( )\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^-^^ --------------------------------------- Received: (at 154572-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2002 16:16:36 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 03 11:16:36 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (wagnolia.lsimmons.net) [63.68.143.76] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17b1Zy-0005on-00; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 11:16:34 -0500 Received: from lance by wagnolia.lsimmons.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17b1Zx-0004FK-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 11:16:33 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 11:16:32 -0500 From: Lance Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: close RFP for gnunet Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.18-2002-07-13 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please close the RFP for gnunet. It already has an ITP. -- .~. /V\ Lance Simmons /( )\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^-^^