Hi, Simon McVittie wrote: > It might be worth noting that GNOME, LXDE and XFCE in at least wheezy do not > use pmount (they all appear to use udisks via gvfs), and neither does KDE > (it appears to use udisks via Solid).
People who use pmount these days probably use it on purpose and do not want to use DE bloat like udisks or udisks2. > Only a few things still depend on pmount: I somehow dislike the words "only" and "still" in that sentence. Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > I'm still using pmount heavily and will not switch to other solutions in > the foreseeable future Same here, except for the "heavily". Don't have to mount external block devices that often. But I strongly prefer to do it on the command-line and pmount is a very convenient way to do that, despite it seems to be initially developed to server as backend for GUI/DE stuff. (Congrats to the upstream authors for having managed that balancing act. :-) > so I'm interested to join the maintenance of this package and the > upstream. I must admit, I'd probably mostly help with packaging and less with upstream. But I'd jump in before pmount is at risk of being removed from Debian. pmount seems to be currently maintained as Alioth project, but I wonder if collab-maint would be better for it in this state to attract more spontaneous contributions and contributors. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131130120024.ga4...@sym.noone.org