On 03/12/2013 11:57, Gilles Filippini wrote: > Gilles Filippini a écrit , Le 01/12/2013 19:06: >> Here is the diff file resulting from the symbols files update for >> release 1.8.12. As I understand it, it doesn't call for a SONAME bump, >> but I'm not that sure about the removed '(optional)' C++ symbols. >> >> What do you think? > > After a few hours of frustration I decided to give a try at keeping > C++ symbols demangled into the symbols files. I came up with the > attached sort-symbols script to do that. This script: > * unmangles C++ symbols > * adds 'optional' and 'c++' tags to them > * alphabetically sorts them > * removes duplicates > > The sort and remove duplicates features are needed for the resulting > file to be compatible with the patch output-ed by dpkg-gensymbols. > Oh, you are not joking! ;) I think this might interest a lot of other people packaging C++ lib. > The resulting libhdf5-7.symbols files for releases 1.8.11 and 1.8.12 > are attached as well. They were generated from these steps: > 1- unmangle the symbols file for release 1.8.11 using the script > sort-symbols > 2- build the package for release 1.8.12 with the resulting symbols file > 3- apply the patch resulting from the dpkg-gensymbols command issued > during the build > 4- run the sort-symbols script against the resulting symbols file to > unmangle and sort the added C++ symbols > 5- build again the package to check that dpkg-gensymbols doesn't > report any difference anymore. > > Is that OK for you? Sounds good. From the results that you can see, do you see a reason to dump the soname ?
Thanks again for your work, Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/529dbb7e.30...@debian.org
