On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 09:50:37PM +0100, Georg Lippitsch wrote:
> Am 10.01.2014, 17:52 Uhr, schrieb Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de>:
> 
>  to do
> >>
> >>apt-get install ffmpeg
> >>
> >>or
> >>
> >>apr-get install libav
> >>...
> >
> >It is a misconception that making this optional would be a reasonable
> >solution - in reality the hassle that would create would is so huge
> >that no sane person would want to implement the packaging for something
> >like that.
> 
> But anyways, the misleading naming of the packages should stop. If
> Debian decides to go with libav, they should not name the package
> ffmpeg. Repeatedly explaining to people that they do not have ffmpeg
> on their computer despite typing "apt-get install ffmpeg" is really
> annoying.

That's already implimented in exactly the way you demand in 
unstable/testing:

  http://packages.debian.org/ffmpeg
  http://packages.debian.org/libav-tools


> Georg

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140110205909.ga24...@bunk.dyndns.info

Reply via email to