Le 08/07/2014 11:47, Thomas Klute a écrit : > Compiling with the same build system (plus freshly generated > debian/control) in a sid chroot works just fine. I'm not sure if this > should be considered important for OpenJDK 8 packaging (looks more like > a binutils bug to me). Any suggestions on how to handle this?
Could this be related to Lintian emitting a debug-file-with-no-debug-symbols warning about these files? > By the way, is the double "-8" in the cacao and jamvm package names > intentional? It seems strange to me. Thank you for spotting this, I made a mistake when I renamed these packages. I pushed a fix. > I've also taken another look at the debian/control situation. My > previous suggestion to remove it from the repository could create the > problem that it could not easily be generated from a fresh repository > clone, because the code in debian/rules expected the file to be present > (though it could be empty). A patch available on my Github repository > [1] fixes that. Good idea, I merged it. I also got caught by this issue once. Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bbe081.2030...@apache.org
