On 07/17/2014 02:39 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: >> My experience with upstream trying to do Debian packaging isn't great. >> Often, they only care about a single package, know it's upstream source, >> but don't perform well on the packaging side. I don't think what you've >> wrote above is a good point of argumentation. > > Uh, thanks.
This wasn't directed to you personally at all, so please don't take it for you! I have no idea how you do on packaging. It was just comments about Dimitri John Ledkov point of argumentation. By the way, Daniel doing the packaging, and you doing peer-review on it because you need it for Ubuntu, and you care for it, is probably the best outcome for this particular package. 2 pairs of eyes is always better than a single one. > Anyway, I'll be posting a new 0.28 release later today, based upon which > Daniel will post a new package, with himself listed as maintainer. We'll > proceed from there. Great, I'm happy it got solved the positive way! On 07/17/2014 02:41 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > Lesson learned? Definitively yes! I don't want this to happen again. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53c6cb84.1020...@debian.org
