Dimitri, Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2014, 16:12:41 schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov: > On 25 July 2014 15:28, Daniel Baumann > > <daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net> wrote: > > Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com> > > > >> Anyway, I'll be posting a new 0.28 release later today, based upon > >> which Daniel will post a new package, with himself listed as > >> maintainer. We'll proceed from there. > > > > seems these words are not worth anything. > > > > instead, Serge uploaded a new version (through Steve) yesterday, and > > ftp-master (eventhough being kept in the loop on all mails in #754910) > > just > > happily accepted that right away. > > > > i spend quite some time on this package, all in vain. hope at least you're > > happy with the way you treat people, because i'm not. > > I'm sorry you feel this way, however my original complaint against > your development around it still stands: please file ITPs in the > future, and please use multiarch for any new libraries, and please > talk to upstream about packaging things, and please have vested > intrinsic knowledge of a given software before embarking on trivial > packaging work around it. Debian is way past the point where we > rapidly trivially package things to "get it in first". Instead we > really are after meritocracy, and making sure the best people > available take care of the individual parts of our operating system. > I'm sure your patches to cgmanager or any other software in Debian is > highly welcome and would be applied/reviewed/NMUed as appropriate. I > value your contributions to Debian, especially when it's something > extraordinary and new. Redoing readily available debian compatible > packaging from scratch, is - all in vain, and I still don't see how > that gave Debian or yourself any competitive advantage, apart from > ultimately delaying integration of newer core components in Debian. > > Back when I was not a DD, I was seeking sponsorship through my teams > and debian-mentors mailing-list / irc channel. At the time, it was > clear that sponsors were setting the standards much higher than what's > required and recommended by policy. To the point of refusing to > sponsor things, until everything was perfect. As a sponsor today, I > try to adhere to the same high standards, but it looks like that may > be slipping in the project. Collectively we should be making sure that > Debian is more like a zen garden, than a kitchen sink.
If I would be on the receiving end of this – maintaining as many packages as Daniel maintains (or – sadly – maintained) – I would probably feel like crap. Cause I would probably receive it like this: Someone devalues my maintainer work that I am so passionate about. I appreciate Daniel´s work and use a lot of his packages on my Debian systems. In the same way some could devalue my work on fsmark or fio as trivial packaging work. Yet… I always thought that every contribution to the Debian project is valuable and welcome. Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2052676.PuhxTCPK48@merkaba
