* Thomas Goirand: " Re: [py3porters-devel] Packaging of suds-jurko" (Wed, 20 May 2015 07:47:22 +0200):
Hi Thomas,
> On 04/21/2015 10:34 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > it looks like pysimplesoap receives a lot more attention than
> > suds-jurko (both in terms of users and upstream maintenance), so if
> > you need to port code to a py3k-enabled soap client, I would point in
> > that direction (in particular for python-debianbts) but if someone is
> > using suds already, suds-jurko might be an easy way out indeed
>
> OpenStack is already using suds-jurko (as a replacement for suds which
> has Python3 support), so if nobody from the DPMT packages it, I'll have
> to do it anyway.
The plans for suds are at #782970 and #774948.
I will wait til the end of this month to take the decision, but I would
recommend exactly the same as Sandro. It looks like suds-jurko is just a little
bit less dead than original suds. Even quite simple and reviewed patches are not
merged, not to talk about releases.
Please bear with me just that one more week, than we will make things clear.
@Sandro: btw. thanks for packaging pysimplesoap!
Cheers,
Mathias
--
Mathias Behrle
PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x8405BBF6
pgpSdsG81FR3l.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
