Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:24:23 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#162769 acknowledged by developer (cleanup) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2002 17:10:42 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 29 12:10:42 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 217-126-176-217.uc.nombres.ttd.es (aenima.amayita.com) [217.126.176.217] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17vhab-0006iM-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:10:42 -0500 Received: by aenima.amayita.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EB59D23AFC8; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:09:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:09:53 +0200 From: Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: RFP: gnome-vim -- Gnome-vim is a Bonobo component which embeds VIM Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Followup-To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.62 Organization: Debian - http://www.debian.org/ X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.18 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-09-29 Severity: wishlist * Package name : gnome-vim Version : 0.1.3 Upstream Author : Jason Hildebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.opensky.ca/gnome-vim/ * License : GPL Description : Gnome-vim is a Bonobo component which embeds VIM and implements (part of) the same interface as the GtkHTML component. [From the web site] Gnome-vim is a Bonobo component which embeds VIM and implements (part of) the same interface as the GtkHTML component. This makes it possible to use VIM in Evolution, instead of the default HTML editor. How does it work? Gnome-vim uses the zvt widget (terminal), and runs a copy of vim inside of that. It implements many of the methods in the GtkHTML interface by sending keystrokes to the embedded vim, to cause it to load and save files, jump to specific parts of the document, etc. Yes, it's a hack. :) Does it work? Gnome-vim doesn't yet implement the full interface; many of the methods are no-ops. However, I've implemented enough that it works quite well with Evolution, and I use it daily. I haven't implemented the Bonobo::PersistFile yet, so you can't do "File->Save" or "File->Save as" from the composer menu and have it work. Sending messages, replying, forwarding, using signatures, saving as drafts and then re-editing, etc. all work. I haven't tested gnome-vim with programs other than Evolution, because I'm not aware of other programs which make use of the GtkHTML component. [I'd love to see this in Debian if it ever gets working.] -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux aenima 2.4.18 #9 Tue Jun 25 20:53:50 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set) -- It's a 106 miles to Chicago. We've got a full tank of gas, half .''`. a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses. : :' : - The Blues Brothers `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (2.4.18 + Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com --------------------------------------- Received: (at 162769-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2002 13:20:26 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 13 07:20:25 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from slider.rack66.net [212.3.252.135] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18BxRR-0005k7-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 07:20:25 -0600 Received: by slider.rack66.net (Postfix, from userid 1026) id C50EAF0A7; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:24:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:24:23 +0100 From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#162769 acknowledged by developer (cleanup) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.6 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02, TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Hi, On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:54:48PM +0100, Amaya wrote: > > My bug requesting a gnome-vim debian package is not solved, so the bug > should not be closed. You never even retitled the bug to an ITP, so why > close it?? Just a lack of information on my part. I unmerged and closed those bugs because they are duplicates of older ITP/RFPs and do not add any info to them. They were just sitting there making the overloaded wnpp bug list even harder to browse through. The originals are still open, though (obviously :-) I didn't cc: all closed bugs because there were so many, though I probably still should have. Regards, Filip -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin