No, i have no craving and no special reason why i wan't to adop these package. The only reason for my decision was that i have it in use and therefore i know a little about it. So if you have no further interests handing over this package i will look for another one.
greetings Stephan Kaufhold On Thursday 14 November 2002 09:58, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 08:01:20PM +0100, Stephan Kaufhold wrote: > > i'm a new maintainer and intent to adop the ifenslave package > > Is this OK for you? Please let me know. > > Is there any reason you want to adopt ifenslave instead of another > package? This is a package with a problem: it needs kernel header files > but it's rather problematic in Debian to depend on kernel-header > packages and get it to build flawlessly by all the build-daemons. > Recently I just removed the dependencies on kernel headers and included > the various needed definitions in the source of infenslave itself > (however that was only possible because the definitions where the same > for all architectures). So now it builds without problems, so I > should've closed the RFA. But if you have a strong interest in this > particular package you can adopt it, however if not I'd suggest you help > out elsewhere.