Hi, toogley wrote: > does it bother, when i work at the package within a delay of a week at most?
If it doesn't bother that I work on the package, too. At least I want to fix the things I broke with the initial 1.7.3 upload. :-) > @Axel: > > May i import + upload the next version of wicd (which is 1.7.5, i think)? Fine for me. I do expect another upstream release anyway, since I told upstream which of the Debian patches he could import. :-) Maybe you should subscribe to the two wicd upstream mailing lists (if you haven't already): http://sourceforge.net/p/wicd/mailman/?source=navbar > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/wicd.html > says, the package building has failed, Oh! Didn't notice so far. Ah, it only failed in one of two builds, in the one with a non-English locale. So there may be locale-dependent things in the build system. > because of "dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on > ./wicd_1.7.3-3.dsc" I don't see that line in the log at https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/logs/unstable/amd64/wicd_1.7.3-3.build2.log.gz (which is the log of the failed build) That line is from https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rbuild/unstable/amd64/wicd_1.7.3-3.rbuild.log which didn't fail. So that's not the reason. This issue is the reason for failed build: [...] dh_install dh_install: wicd-daemon missing files: usr/share/locale/ dh_install: missing files, aborting debian/rules:8 : la recette pour la cible « binary » a échouée make: *** [binary] Erreur 255 dpkg-buildpackage: erreur: fakeroot debian/rules binary a produit une erreur de sortie de type 2 Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
