[Setting reply-to Debian-Edu]
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:29:12PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> >If anybody of the people responding tp the ITA bug like to become the
> >main maintainer of the package I'd be more than happy to sponsor the
> >package. As far as the situation is now I'll upload my current work in
> >Git tomorrow.
>
> The current version is here because the package is being adopted by the
> Debian Edu team:
>
> https://alioth.debian.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=debian-edu/pkg-team/xrdp.git;a=summary
>
> The package is pending upload to experimental.
>
> If you have anything special about your packaging, feel free to share it so
> we can incorporate it.
Is there any point in droping the history from debian/changelog and
feeding it with non-Debian releases instead? I'm perfectly happy with
moving the package to Debian Edu. However, I have some concerns:
0. The fact that the development of the package happened silently
and in parallel to an existing Debian package.
1. There is no defined way to get the upstream source - there is just
# We don’t provide a get-orig-source target because submodules
in debian/rules.
I would really prefer the gbp layout featuring an upstream and a
pristine-tar branch
2. You should *definitely* restore the old changelog of xrdp and
assemble all changes between the current released package (0.6.1-2)
to your release candidate.
3. Why do you plan
a) a non-official (random?) Git commit rather than a release?
b) uploading to experimental rather than unstable?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
