Hello, finally got some time to move this forward. I have packaged dependencies for vdirsyncer and vdirsyncer itself is waiting for review and upload [1].
I also completely rework Khal packaging, waiting for review as well [2]. So I am expecting Khal will reach Debian unstable soon :-) --- [1] https://github.com/fpytloun/debian-vdirsyncer [2] https://github.com/fpytloun/debian-khal Filip On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:14:47 +0200 Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> wrote: > Hi Filip, > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:13:48PM +0100, Filip Pytloun wrote: > > I have prepare khal package: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/khal > > > > Is there anyone interested in sponsoring it? > > I am interested in this package and would like to see it included in > Debian. I spent a brief look into it already and found a number of > issues: > > * debian/copyright: The license grant for the MIT license suspiciously > looks like a GPL grant and references the non-existent file > /usr/share/common-licenses/MIT. > * khal.conf.sample should be installed using dh_installexamples instead > of dh_installdocs. > * Your patches say what they are doing, but the patch headers lack > reasoning on why they are necessary (in particular the second patch). > * It seems that you are packaging khal as a Python2 application, but > upstream only declares it working with Python3. Is there any reason > not to use Python3? > * Instead of installing the manual page twice, please use a symbolic > link. Try using dh_link. > > At least the copyright issue is a blocker. > > If you update the package, please Cc me, so I can have another look. > > Helmut > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
