On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 09:03 -0400, David Steele wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> >> wrote: >> > >> > On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 02:35 +0000, David Steele wrote: >> > > >> > > Package: wnpp >> > > Severity: wishlist >> > > > >> > > > Owner: David Steele <ste...@debian.org> >> > > >> > > * Package name : gocryptfs >> > >> > What benefits does it provide over ecryptfs, which is already >> > supported >> > in Debian? >> > >> >> https://nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/comparison/ > > OK, but it would be helpful to summarise the main advantages, like: > > - Includes integrity checking > - Doesn't leak information about names of encrypted files >
In the vs. ecryptfs case, the differences are more basic. I'd list kernel/root vs FUSE/user, cloud sync support[1], and the availability of a user management gui[2]. [1] https://www.cryfs.org/comparison#ecryptfs [2] https://mhogomchungu.github.io/sirikali/