On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Jan Mojzis <jan.moj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It appears there is copies of GPLv3 code from NaCL in the source. I'm > not a > > > lawyer, but I think that is making the distribution as "public domain" > > > pretty much illegal? Or am I missing something here? > > > > Hello, > > NaCl is not GPL3. > > It's public-domain https://nacl.cr.yp.to/features.html > <http://nacl.cr.yp.to/features.html> > Ah, fair enough. It appears it has been included in other GPLv3 projects without noting that that part of it was public domain.
