On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 23:16:52 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Le 18/11/2016 à 14:41, Frederic Bonnard a écrit : > > Hi Frederic, > > > There is much work to finalize this if that is ok, but indeed, before > > continuing I'd like to know if I'm on the good path. > > This looks like a valid approach. Did you use Scala 2.10 or 2.11 for > compiling SBT?
I used scala 2.11 as it's the one available in unstable. > If you have a working SBT package I suggest uploading it > now to experimental/non-free, this will enable others to jump in and > help with the dependencies. Well, that's where I'm unsure. I packaged in a functional manner all the sbt components I listed above, meaning, that it would need further work (on control/copyright/...etc files). This was a POC and functionally speaking, that seems to work. Now if the approach I followed is valid according to Debian policy, I'll do things properly to push sbt and that minimal set of dependencies in experimental. I don't think it would be ok to do a binary upload. My idea was to do a full clean source upload, right ? If so, I'll focus on the coming days/weeks to provide all this. F.
