Your message dated Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:56:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2002 00:16:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 26 19:16:52 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from snoopy.apana.org.au [203.12.237.97] (postfix)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 185b6q-000702-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:16:52 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 8413C2C9DD; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:18:39 +1100 (EST)
Received: by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1003)
        id 872122C9A0; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:18:38 +1100 (EST)
From: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: scannerdaemon
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:18:38 +1100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Razor-id: de97e916871ae4df012c07c6a774d3e1a0b93c3b
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-10-27
Severity: normal

scannerdaemon no longer works in Debian with the DFSG compliant
jikes and kaffe and latest virus signatures downloaded with oav-update.

A good alternative exists, clamav, which is written entirely in C++.

Hence, I am no longer interested in maintaining this package
anymore.

This is not however to imply that scannerdaemon is a bad program, it
isn't.

-- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel:
Linux snoopy 2.4.18 #1 Thu Jul 11 16:32:07 EST 2002 i686 Locale:
LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 166545-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2003 12:56:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 03 06:56:30 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18fg9G-000763-00; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 06:56:30 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 5D65D26BD0; Mon,  3 Feb 2003 13:52:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 6C9CC2356A; Mon,  3 Feb 2003 13:56:22 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:56:22 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
        tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
              USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

scannerdaemon |      5.1-5 | source, all
Closed bugs: 170496

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; orphaned, replaced by clamav.



-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to