I am not a maintainer or developer but an active user if debain and keepass. I would be willing to take this in depending on timeframe. I have time starting next week to devote to this. I have built packages in the past so this is not a huge issue for me
On Feb 14, 2017 5:45 PM, "KeePassXC Team" <t...@keepassxc.org> wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name : keepassxc > Version : 2.1.1 > Upstream Author : KeePassXC <packag...@keepassxc.org> > * URL : https://keepassxc.org > * License : GPLv2, GPLv3 > Programming Lang: C++ > Description : Community fork of KeePassX, a free and open-source > cross-platform password manager. > > KeePassXC aims to incorporate many pull requests as well as additional > newly developed features that have never been merged into KeePassX. > Besides many bug fixes and other minor changes, the current version > (2.1.1) already contains the following additional features: > > - Autotype on all three major platforms (Linux, Windows, OS X) > - Stand-alone password generator > - Password strength meter > - Use website's favicons as entry icons > - Merging of databases > - Automatic reload when the database changed on disk > - KeePassHTTP support for use with PassIFox in Firefox and chromeIPass > in Google Chrome and Chromium > > More features will come in 2.2.0. (e.g. Yubikey support, Twofish cipher > support, a welcome screen redesign, general user interface improvements > etc.) > > At the time of the fork, KeePassXC built upon the latest but never > released KeePassX source tree, which included the switch to Qt5. > > I'm writing you as one of the main developers of KeePassXC. We would > like to get KeePassXC into the official Debian repositories and from > there into other derivatives such as Ubuntu. We would be willing to > package KeePassXC ourselves, but since none of us developers is an > active Debian user, we would like to ask first if someone else would be > willing to package it for us. In the interest of package quality, this > would likely be best. Packaging KeePassXC is (and for the foreseeable > future will be) quite similar to packaging KeePassX, so maybe the > original KeePassX maintainer could handle this if he's willing to? He's > on X-Debbugs-Cc. > > Thanks and regards > Janek > >
