* Mathias Behrle: " Re: [tryton-debian] Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Thu, 5 Oct 2017 12:01:16 +0200):
Hi Adam,
are there any news on the subject?
The release of Tryton, that will require python-magic is scheduled for next
week. It would be a great service to our users and simplify things a lot, if we
had a common python-magic in place. Please let us know, if we can help with the
planned merge.
Thanks,
Mathias
> * Adam Hupp: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 3 Oct 2017
> 11:06:38 -0700):
>
> That's good news, Adam, thanks for it! Looking forward to get your diff.
>
> Best regards,
> Mathias
>
>
> > Sorry about the slow response. This has been a pain for a while. I
> > have a provisional diff to merge the two packages. Will give it some
> > testing and pass a branch to you folks to take a look. Ideally the
> > upstream file package would take it over.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Mathias Behrle <mbeh...@debian.org> wrote:
> > > * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 5 Sep
> > > 2017 18:24:25 +0200):
> > >
> > >> Mathias Behrle wrote...
> > >>
> > >> > * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4
> > >> > Sep 2017 19:38:56 +0200):
> > >>
> > >> > > The cleanest solution indeed was to bring both upstreams together and
> > >> > > ask them to reconcile the APIs and eventually make one of the both
> > >> > > implementations obsolete. As things happen such an attempt was
> > >> > > started two years ago but appearently never came to a result.[1]
> > >> >
> > >> > Agreed, that this would be the cleanest solution, but as you say there
> > >> > is little probability, that the two upstreams will work together to
> > >> > merge their implementations.
> > >>
> > >> Still this should be tried first. Also, I'm not that pessimistic, see
> > >> below. So let's bring the parties involved into the loop:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Thanks for your additional information and initiative to re-launch the
> > > merge of the two packages. This reads much better and more optimistic than
> > > what I could find until now! Crossing fingers now in the hope for the best
> > > outcome for everybody.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Mathias
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mathias Behrle
> > > PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0xD6D09BE48405BBF6
> > > AC29 7E5C 46B9 D0B6 1C71 7681 D6D0 9BE4 8405 BBF6
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
Mathias Behrle
PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0xD6D09BE48405BBF6
AC29 7E5C 46B9 D0B6 1C71 7681 D6D0 9BE4 8405 BBF6
pgpLmeEMVVISI.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
