On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:15:47PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Would you be interested in team maintenance and a bit of an experiment?
Hah! You just fell into a trap. The thing is, upstream of this theme has gone missing (doesn't respond on any e-mail address nor github for months), and while I fixed some GTK 3.20/22 regressions myself, I don't think I know enough to do an adequate job. So the downside of team maintenance is that you might get abused and called on to take a look. :รพ (I don't see any dark theme that looks nice enough, thus maintaining this one is probably worth the effort.) > I was planning to start a Team for several months, but after I became > a DD and was about to request a team be set up, I found that there > wasn't really an obvious path for how to do that any more. > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/09/msg00221.html Sounds good. I've been skimming through the Salsa thread, but I admit I did not pay enough attention to know what's the preferred new way to do such things. > Now, things still aren't very clear but I guess it sort of works. We > can create a GitLab team and a Debian Tracker team. We can use > @packages.debian.org as the Maintainer for now. It doesn't sound like $PACKAGE@p.d.o is good for something more than a lead package and a bunch of addons for it -- but I might be misreading it. So, for now I'll look at upstreamy parts of the package (like, Cinnamon and XFWM pieces are missing in git, released as separate gnome-look.org tarballs) -- let me know what should I put in the Maintainer: field. > See also today's debian-devel list discussion about salsa.debian.org. Aye. Meow! -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.