Your message dated Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:42:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#186297: ITA: wdg-html-validator,wdg-html-reference
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2003 22:40:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 16:40:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from samadhi.braincells.com (mail.braincells.com) [216.162.42.100]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18xx63-0006hc-00; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:40:43 -0600
Received: by mail.braincells.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 57D89852D; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:40:45 -0500 (EST)
From: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: wdg-html-validator,wdg-html-reference
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:40:45 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-03-25
Severity: normal
As I have less time for Debian these days, I want to use it better by
shifting my package load around. Therefore I want to give up these two
packages. I will keep maintaining them until a new owner is found.
wdg-html-validator is as the name suggests a way to validate HTML
documents against various DTDs. There is a CGI script and a standalone
commandline validator. Both are written in perl.
wdg-html-reference is a set of guides to HTML 3.0, 3.2, and 4.0. It is a
set of web pages which can be used by themselves or as part of the
validator. (Therefor it makes sense for the same person to take both.)
For the main part, they are pretty low-maintainence and currently
bug-free.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 186297-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2003 13:43:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 06 08:43:22 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from csiges9.insa-lyon.fr (mail.insa-lyon.fr) [134.214.79.200]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 192AQc-0006sE-00; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 08:43:22 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail.insa-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C204B423
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:42:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from serveur.aurel32.net (F110.resF.insa-lyon.fr [134.214.165.23])
by mail.insa-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F934B422
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:42:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from amavis by serveur.aurel32.net with scanned-ok (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 192AQ0-0005yU-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 15:42:44 +0200
Received: from pc.aurel32 ([192.168.3.10])
by serveur.aurel32.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 192APz-0005yL-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 15:42:43 +0200
Received: from aurel32 by pc.aurel32 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 192AQ8-0001yL-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 15:42:52 +0200
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:42:52 +0200
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#186297: ITA: wdg-html-validator,wdg-html-reference
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.3i (2002-12-17)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=4.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
I have uploaded new versions of the two packages. I am therefore closing
this bug.
--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+kC7cw3ao2vG823MRAroPAJ0ZQmJTj1XI52IN/51k90lzfs4LhACdFPNy
ixtD4QYT0Cwk99i1FderqXM=
=EMEf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--
