Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2003 02:30:14 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2003 16:00:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 04 10:00:24 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.w-4.de [195.126.150.2]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Uqil-0000xl-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 10:00:23 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mail.w-4.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id RAA18652
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 17:00:21 +0100
Received: by tr.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D48131B801E; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 16:54:15 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andreas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: basilix
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 16:54:15 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-04
Severity: normal
Upstream ignored me since 2 years, he never implemented my fixes
His old fashioned programming-type is out of date. IF theres a new
upstreamversion i have to rewrite it. The only reason for me
to make a deb was his wap support, he dropped this also, so it makes
no sense to keep hundrets webmailprogramm on ftp.
http://www.basilix.org looks also unmaintained. since 14.1.2002,
no changes there. If somebody want adopt this, newer fixed versions and
packages are under p.d.o/~amu/basilix/ available.
If nobody want adopt it, i suggest remove the package after a period
of 3 month.
Cheers amu
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux tr.debian.net 2.4.20-ben1 #1 Thu Dec 19 20:49:19 CET 2002 ppc
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 175312-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2003 16:30:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 18 11:30:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 196Yl9-0006nm-00; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:30:43 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 7A61F26B2C; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:30:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9D5752390C; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 02:30:14 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 02:30:14 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=4.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
basilix | 1.0.3b-1.1 | source, all
Closed bugs: 187979
------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; orphaned, unresponsive upstream
----------------------------------------------
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
