Philipp Kern: > On 2018-07-18 18:24, ju xor wrote: >> Philipp Kern: >>> Should this live in some kind of tor-* namespace? >> no > > Without any rationale? :( >
i'm not sure what you mean, but in case it helps, here some arguments why sbws package is not called something like tor-sbws: - upstream is not using "tor-*" in the name - i don't think there's a Debian policy to name packages as "tor-*" [0] - AFAICT, the only package in Debian that is named as "tor-*" is "tor-geoipbd", and that's a package on which "tor" itself depends on. - "tor" itself does not depends on sbws, though sbws makes use of "tor" - python3-stem is a library to control tor on which sbws depends, and it's not called "tor-*" - nyx, is a tor monitor, and is not called "tor-*" - there're several packages called "onion*", which is not "tor-*" Best, ju. [0] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#the-package-name