Ian Jackson writes ("Re: possible conflict over the /usr/bin/ia namespace"): > Antoine Beaupré writes ("Re: possible conflict over the /usr/bin/ia > namespace"): > > On 2018-09-25 14:22:44, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > If you can't get a better idea I would suggest > > > << 0.242+git20151019-1.1~ > > > which is all versions until the next draft(~)-of-an-nmu (.1). > > > > But wouldn't <= 0.242+git20151019-1~ be as effective? Why does it need > > to be <<? > > 0.242+git20151019-1 is not <= 0.242+git20151019-1~ so that is > definitely wrong. Maybe you meant <= 0.242+git20151019-1.1~ ? > But if I were preparing an NMU I would be intending to use > 0.242+git20151019-1.1 as the nmu version; and my draft packages would > be called precisely 0.242+git20151019-1.1~ and don't want to be > conflicted against. Hence 0.242+git20151019-1.1~
I mean, hence << 0.242+git20151019-1.1~ Ian.