On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 4:12 PM Hilko Bengen <ben...@debian.org> wrote: > > * Robert J. Clay: > > > Did you push all of the branches? I only see one branch, named > > 'upstream'; and like I mentioned, that only has one commit listed when > > I look *using 'tid', for instance). No 'pristine-tar' or even a > > 'master' branch. > > There are two branches, "upstream" and "master".
Ah, it seems I should have looked at the repo as it is online more closely. I've pulled the 'master' branch. I'll continue reviewing it and I've already done a local test build (in buster) as well as running lintian directly using the '-IE --pedantic --show-overrides' parameters. > No "pristine-tar" branch. I suppose that with an upstream which has not been updated in years, having a 'pristine-tar' branch is not quite as useful as it can be with other packages with a more active upstream. In fact, I wonder if uploads would even need the orig archive. (I'll need it for local builds, of course.) > For some reason Gitlab thinks that "upstream" should be the > "default" branch, i.e. the branch that is checked out after a git clone. That's a salsa (gitlab) setting for the repository. I've changed that to 'master'. -- Robert James Clay rjc...@gmail.com j...@rocasa.us