I did indeed make an intent to package, however I was contacted by the original person who was going to package it and was told that someone else was working on putting it together, so I contacted that person back in March, and include their response below. I was assuming that they would send something to the BTS about the fact that they were actually working on it, but apparantly they didn't.
I would like to get this package in, as I am particularly eager to have it available (especially since I am maintaining the kernel patch), and am wondering if Arnd is still intending to get a package made? >From: Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Taking over ITP] >Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 03:24:13 +0100 >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kevin Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Status: RO >X-Status: A >Content-Length: 11451 >Lines: 198 > > >On Thursday 06 March 2003 02:21, Micah Anderson wrote: >> Arnd, >> >> I wanted to drop you into the loop because I am very motivated to get the >> lkcd package completed. Yann mentioned I should contact you because he had >> sent his preliminary work to you. Have you gotten anywhere with what he h= >as >> done, where can I pick it up? I have almost finished a package, but would >> be interested to see what you have in case there is something I should ad= >d. > >I haven't found the time to work on it in the last week, but I had some >progress. I have ported it to CVS head, changed lcrash to be built for >all available targets in one binary instead of only for the default >architecture, and changed building qlcrash to link against qt3-mt. >There are two of my coworkers (Michael Holzheu and Andreas Herrman) >that working on the upstream code and I planned to go through >any changes with them so they can check them in to the CVS. > >I still want to split out lcrash into its own package, because the other >parts are not needed on s390 and check that it builds on the s390 >build server. The attached diff is where I stopped last week, >hopefully we can merge our work. > >I am now also in the progress of becoming a DD and want to do the package >for my Task. I have put Kevin Rosenberg on CC because he is my >Application Maintainer. >I am not interested on the kernel-patch-lkcd package, because I'm not >actually using it. I only use lcrash to analyse system dumps from the >s390 dump facility. > > Arnd <>< > > ----- Forwarded message from Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > > > Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:37:38 +0100 > > From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Taking over ITP > > > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:51:10PM -0800, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > I would like to take over the ITP for the lkcd package. > > > > > > I am not a DD, but I have a sponsor and intend to upload shortly. > > > > Ah OK. Please check with Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > who also notified me of his interest in this package, and to whom I > > have sent my preliminary work. > > > > I think it would also make sense that the one taking lkcdutils would > > adopt the kernel-patch-lkcd package as well. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =20 > > http://www.alcove.com/ Technical support manager =20 > > Responsable de l'assistance technique Senior Free-Software Consultant = =20 > > Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres Debian developer > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) D?veloppeur Debian > On Fri, 16 May 2003, Guillaume Morin wrote: > Hi, > > According to the Debian BTS, you intended to package lckdutils along > with the kernel patch. Do you still plan to upload it ? > > Regards, > > Guillaume. > > -- > Guillaume Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > What is the point of trying to dream anymore ? (Alanis Morisette)
