Your message dated Thu, 29 May 2003 11:29:38 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line New maintainer has released new packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2003 00:50:01 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 12 19:50:00 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hadesian.demon.co.uk (hadesian.co.uk) [62.49.3.204] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19FNzT-0002CS-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 19:49:59 -0500 Received: by hadesian.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A30AB18D4F9; Tue, 13 May 2003 01:49:58 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 01:49:58 +0100 From: Robert McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFA: ap-utils -- Access Point SNMP Utils for Linux Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Looking for a new maintainer for ap-utils. I don't use it a great deal and there must be people who are more interested in this kind of thing to maintain it. There's a new upstream version at http://ap-utils.polesye.net/ which may fix some outstanding endian/64-bit problems, or then again, may not. Upstream is highly responsive and helpful, not a stressful package to maintain. Regards, Rob --------------------------------------- Received: (at 193116-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2003 09:29:41 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 29 04:29:40 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 62-43-44-84.user.ono.com (landru.mitago.net) [62.43.44.84] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19LJjA-0004cH-00; Thu, 29 May 2003 04:29:40 -0500 Received: (qmail 26615 invoked by uid 1000); 29 May 2003 09:29:38 -0000 Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 11:29:38 +0200 From: Celso =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New maintainer has released new packages Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) As a new maintainer I have released new packages and solved several pending bugs.