Your message dated Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:32:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line upstream gone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 15:30:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 10:30:45 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h81.ryd.student.liu.se (diamond.opal.dhs.org) [130.236.239.81]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1542VB-0002yU-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 10:30:45 -0500
Received: from ola by diamond.opal.dhs.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 1542Uy-0002tG-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:30:32 +0200
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 17:30:32 +0200
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ITP: gnomesensors
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
Sender: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: whishlist
Hi
I intend to package gnomesensors.
http://www.brendy.addr.com/linux/gnomesensors/
License: GNU (or other similar to X)
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 98921-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2003 13:33:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 03 08:32:38 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from slider.rack66.net [212.3.252.135]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Y4CU-0003YX-00; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 08:32:38 -0500
Received: by slider.rack66.net (Postfix, from userid 1026)
id 9D4B8F276; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:32:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:32:36 +0200
From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: upstream gone
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
The upstream URL given in the original report is dead.
Given the age of the ITP/RFP, this was a G1 package, making it fairly
useless now anyway, and considering even the old version was reportedly
not useful there is no more need to keep this open.
Regards,
Filip
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
