Your message dated Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:32:36 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line upstream gone has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 15:30:45 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 10:30:45 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from h81.ryd.student.liu.se (diamond.opal.dhs.org) [130.236.239.81] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1542VB-0002yU-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 10:30:45 -0500 Received: from ola by diamond.opal.dhs.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 1542Uy-0002tG-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:30:32 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 17:30:32 +0200 From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: gnomesensors Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i Sender: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Severity: whishlist Hi I intend to package gnomesensors. http://www.brendy.addr.com/linux/gnomesensors/ License: GNU (or other similar to X) Regards, // Ola -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING | | +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- Received: (at 98921-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2003 13:33:53 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 03 08:32:38 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from slider.rack66.net [212.3.252.135] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19Y4CU-0003YX-00; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 08:32:38 -0500 Received: by slider.rack66.net (Postfix, from userid 1026) id 9D4B8F276; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:32:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:32:36 +0200 From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: upstream gone Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) The upstream URL given in the original report is dead. Given the age of the ITP/RFP, this was a G1 package, making it fairly useless now anyway, and considering even the old version was reportedly not useful there is no more need to keep this open. Regards, Filip -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin