Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2003 08:53:53 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Stop packaging of xemacs-packages -- Debian packaging of XEmacs packages? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2001 01:10:59 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 30 19:10:59 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14j9us-0008AZ-00; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:10:58 -0600 Received: (qmail 24381 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2001 01:10:55 -0000 Received: from adsl-63-193-247-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2001 01:10:55 -0000 Received: from daniel by adsl-63-193-247-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14j9px-00088A-00; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:05:53 -0800 To: Debian GNU/Linux bug list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: ITP: xemacs-packages -- Debian packaging of XEmacs packages Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 30 Mar 2001 17:05:53 -0800 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 17 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist I'd be interested in working on a set of scripts to convert the XEmacs packages into Debian packages. I'm trying to decide whether to make each one a separate source package, with an extra priority package containing the scripts; or whether to put everything into one source package. Right now I'm leaning toward the first choice: then when one of the packages is updated, only that package would have to be upgraded by people using XEmacs. But that has the slight disadvantage of cluttering up the Sources file. I'd be interested in any opinions you might have about this. -- Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED] haven't had breakfast yet." -- Orson Scott Card --------------------------------------- Received: (at 92248-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2003 15:54:05 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 20 10:54:02 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19eGVe-0006NX-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 10:54:02 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19eGVX-0001Bo-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 11:53:55 -0400 Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 19eGVV-0001Pd-PG; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 08:53:53 -0700 To: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stop packaging of xemacs-packages -- Debian packaging of XEmacs packages? References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 08:53:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Andreas Barth's message of "Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:54:25 +0200") Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tags 92248 +unreproducible > thanks > > Hi, > > I think this report should be closed, because there is no source but > the original reporter said he is "interested in working on a set of > scripts". However, no code, no package. > > However, if you think different please say so and please retitle to > ITP (and then work on it ;). > If no-one stands up, I will close this RFP in one month. Actually, I did produce split packages once. But it turned out to be way too many small packages for Anthony Towns' taste. -- Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED] haven't had breakfast yet." -- Orson Scott Card