Looks spectacular. I'd be very happy for you to upload it. Thanks!
- Daniel On 4/29/21 1:50 AM, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: >>> I'd be happy to sponsor it. >> I would very much appreciate that > Okay then! > > (CCing the WPNN bug, for posterity, and so others can see this is taken.) > > Took a quick look, and did a major updating of the debian/ packaging scripts. > > There were issues with passing flags through to the actual compiler, > so I did some Rube Goldberg tricks to bypass the top-level Makefile > and let debhelper do its tricks with qmake. > Ultimately, the "right thing" would be to mess about with the > "upstream" build scripts to make them more standard, like have the > qmake stuff do the installation, have only one qmake invocation, yada > yada. > > Anyway, I forked your github repo and pushed my changes there. Please > check if it works with my scripts. If you're happy with everything, I > can just upload it. Or if you'd rather, I can be more hands-off and > sponsor someone else's uploads (e.g., yours) and let you do all the > packaging stuff w/ my feedback etc. However as a PI myself, I know > what I'd choose! > > Minor stuff: > > Not sure if it belongs in "science" because that's generally for > things like data analysis software, numeric methods, machine learning > libraries, etc. > But what the heck. That gives it an automatic team maintenance, which is nice. > And it can always be shifted. > > There are some compiler warnings, like using an old sort function > instead of the new approved one. Someone should probably take a look > at them sometime. > > I'm renamed the icon to just eln, since the longer one seems a bit > silly: what if (no offense) you're hit by a bus? > > Cheers, > > --Barak.
