Hello, I have removed the patch, it wasn’t good idea. The exe binary doesn’t affect debian package. So I just updates the d/source/include-binary file.
Thanks Jan > On 1 Oct 2021, at 12:02, Bastian Germann <b...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 06 Feb 2021 19:18:43 +0100 Jan Mojzis <jan.moj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Package: wnpp >> Severity: wishlist >> Owner: Jan Mojzis <jan.moj...@gmail.com> >> * Package name : bearssl >> Version : 0.6 >> Upstream Author : Thomas Pornin <por...@bolet.org> >> * URL : https://bearssl.org >> * License : MIT >> Programming Lang: C >> Description : BearSSL is an implementation of the SSL/TLS protocol (RFC >> 5246) written in C >> BearSSL is an implementation of the SSL/TLS protocol (RFC 5246) written in >> C. It aims at offering the following features: >> - Be correct and secure. In particular, insecure protocol versions and >> choices of algorithms are not supported, by design; cryptographic algorithm >> implementations are constant-time by default. >> - Be small, both in RAM and code footprint. For instance, a minimal server >> implementation may fit in about 20 kilobytes of compiled code and 25 >> kilobytes of RAM. >> - Be highly portable. BearSSL targets not only “big” operating systems like >> Linux and Windows, but also small embedded systems and even special contexts >> like bootstrap code. >> - Be feature-rich and extensible. SSL/TLS has many defined cipher suites and >> extensions; BearSSL should implement most of them, and allow extra algorithm >> implementations to be added afterwards, possibly from third parties >> Library doesn't have compatible API with mainstream OpenSSL. >> And it's not intended as an OpenSSL 1-1 replacement. >> I'm using this software and I'm going to maintain using >> https://salsa.debian.org/. >> I need sponsor. > > Please replace the exe removing patch with a Files-Excluded rule in > d/copyright. This is a repack then, which has to be reflected in the version > string. > Else this looks good to me. > > The usual process to ask for sponsors is filing an RFS. It will get more > attention then.