Your message dated Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:20:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already adopted, closing stale WNPP bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2002 19:10:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 23 14:10:46 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (c2bapps8.btconnect.com) [193.113.209.32] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17tYbV-0007mU-00; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:10:46 -0500
Received: from deneb (actually host ppp-1-168.carl-a-1.access.uk.tiscali.com) 
by c2bapps8 with SMTP (XT-PP) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:10:14 +0100
Received: from hussain by deneb with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
        id 17tYfK-0004M6-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:14:42 +0100
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:14:41 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: O: efax
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
X-Message: Support Free Software - Use Debian GNU/Linux 
From: Muhammad Hussain Yusuf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: efax
Severity: normal
-- 
Unix IS user friendly... It is just                            
selective about who its friends are.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 162056-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2003 10:20:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 20 05:20:14 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from head.linpro.no [80.232.36.1] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19pQ4c-0003uk-00; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 05:20:14 -0500
Received: from echo.linpro.no ([80.232.36.157])
        by head.linpro.no with esmtp (Exim 4.14 #1 (Debian))
        id 19pQ4X-0002LR-4e; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:20:09 +0200
Received: from tore by echo.linpro.no with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 19pQ4U-0006lV-00; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:20:06 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Already adopted, closing stale WNPP bug
From: Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Linpro AS;  <http://www.linpro.no/>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:20:06 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----)
X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) 
*19pQ4X-0002LR-4e*AD0Oo0WDZEo*
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_30,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


  As Filippo Panessa (who retitled this bug to an ITA) uploaded a new
 version with on the 16th of April, changing the maintainer field, I
 assume the package is indeed adopted already, so I'm getting rid of
 this WNPP entry.

-- 
Tore Anderson

Reply via email to