Your message dated Mon, 25 Aug 2003 07:44:02 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Misunderstood
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2003 16:03:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 17 11:03:21 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from traven9.uol.com.br [200.221.29.35] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19oQ00-0001F2-00; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 11:03:21 -0500
Received: from pegasus.phoenixnet ([200.148.46.15])
        by traven9.uol.com.br (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA15012;
        Sun, 17 Aug 2003 13:03:18 -0300 (BRT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: "Guilherme de S. Pastore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: eggdrop -- Advanced IRC Robot
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.22
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 13:03:18 -0300
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-17
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : eggdrop
  Version         : 1.6.15
  Upstream Author : EggHeads <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL             : 
ftp://ftp.eggheads.org/pub/eggdrop/source/1.6/eggdrop1.6.15.tar.gz
* License         : GPL
  Description     : Advanced IRC Robot

 Eggdrop is an IRC bot written in C. Eggdrop, being a bot, sits on a channel
 and takes protective measures: to keep the channel from being taken over
 (in the few ways that anything can), to recognize banished users or sites
 and  reject them, to recognize privileged users and let them gain ops, etc.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pegasus.phoenixnet 2.4.21-xfs #5 Seg Jun 30 23:48:35 BRT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.ISO-8859-1


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 205927-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2003 10:44:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 25 05:44:09 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from silva5.uol.com.br [200.221.29.52] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19rEpV-0005v6-00; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 05:44:09 -0500
Received: from pegasus.phoenixnet ([200.148.46.7])
        by silva5.uol.com.br (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA16173
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 07:44:07 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 07:44:02 -0300
From: "Guilherme de S. Pastore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Misunderstood
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.:Fos5KA:XCuF(p"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0
        tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM,
              SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

--=.:Fos5KA:XCuF(p
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This was really an ITP.
I'm getting the package from Ian Eure, actually,
and wanted to avoid duplicated work.

Anyway, it looks unncessary, so I'm closing it.

Regards,

-- 
Guilherme de S. Pastore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--=.:Fos5KA:XCuF(p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Seh3GJU/LHOwJZIRAvMqAJ4thyg/BJWyqhHOsfnQegYOEhxu3ACgv7kK
kbxel3pPugRG4vMfYLwZGTw=
=8npM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=.:Fos5KA:XCuF(p--

Reply via email to