On Montag, 1. September 2003 15:17, Ben Burton wrote: > > Ugh, why do you want to introduce a metapackage ? Is there a reason > > for that ? kde-i18n doesn't have nor need one either :-) > > The reason for suggesting it was for the sort of people who would > traditionally download koffice-i18n from the KDE servers and build and > install it. > > As I see it, if you don't like it, nobody's going to force you to > install it. You could say the same about kde-extras - I'm certainly not > going to download a metapackage that depends on all sorts of random > unrelated KDE apps bound only by the fact that they all link with > kdelibs. But I'm not complaining about its existence. > > As it happens however, I uploaded a few hours ago without the > metapackage. But I honestly don't see how it would have harmed anyone.
It wouldn't have harmed anyone but I think it doesn't make much sense either - you don't have one for kde-i18n also. Ralf > > Ben. -- We're not a company, we just produce better code at less costs. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralf Nolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] The K Desktop Environment The KDevelop Project http://www.kde.org http://www.kdevelop.org
pgpCKQ2dMYRv6.pgp
Description: signature