Hi, On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 11:43:35AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > I think isync should be removed. It is in non-US, although it should > > be in main, has been orphaned since Feburary and it's not even the > > last version. I don't know if Nicolas is going to adopt it, you > > expressed interest in March but never did? > > > > Joey, what do you think? I suppose you haven't tried isync recently? > > Not in some time, but I did maintain it breifly, and it's an ok peice of > software, but one that does the same job as offlineimap with near 100% > overlap. I think it'd be ok to remove it if there is no interested > maintainer.
Well, I'd rather not see isync droped, as it is the only one, AFAIK, that is able to limit the number of messages is each mailbox. Currently, I have only used the version in Woody, but I really should try the latest upstream version and eventually adopt it. But I don't know if I'll be able to do it on time for Sarge... :-/ Regards, Nicolas