Hello, On Mon 16 Oct 2023 at 07:46pm +02, Martin wrote:
> Quoting Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name>: >> Typically we try to patch out the need for build-deps like this. Have >> you tried to do that? > > Thanks for the suggestion, I'll do that! > > I did that for the current version of the package (which uses cask, not > eask). And I can probably keep it that way. I wonder, if that is the > right direction for the future, in case more and more packages use such > build tools? But maybe this bug is not the right place to discuss it. Typically these things come in and out of fashion quite fast. If you find a package where it looks like stripping it out will be a lot of labour, let's discuss. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
