Your message dated Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:24:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line new maintainer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2001 20:10:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 28 14:10:52 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lns03v-11-199.w.club-internet.fr (seneca.club-internet.fr) 
[212.194.46.199] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16K3LA-0004VU-00; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 14:10:52 -0600
Received: by club-internet.fr
        via sendmail from stdin
        id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.114)
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 21:10:50 +0100 (CET) 
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 21:10:50 +0100
From: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFA: rscheme -- Threaded, persistent, OO, scheme interpreter and 
compiler.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="F8dlzb82+Fcn6AgP"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
Fcc: ~/Mail/outbox
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--F8dlzb82+Fcn6AgP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I adopted the package some time ago since it had a number of bugs that I
was able to fix. However, I am not really interested in continuing
maintenance of rscheme since I am not using it myself. There are some
open bugs in connection with porting to various architectures, the
problem is in the memory managment module.

If you take it then you get rescheme-modules as free bonus :-)

-Ralf.

--F8dlzb82+Fcn6AgP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8LNHKtzWmSeC6BMERAtfwAJoC4qElC4lAsXBzMvLk7z0CWRDnswCgtS78
YcqqI8aHr2IWqqfJeXKLb9M=
=nkhB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--F8dlzb82+Fcn6AgP--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 126785-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2003 09:24:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 30 03:24:35 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gw.fyresdal.com (solsikke) [81.0.149.77] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AF92h-0000jX-00; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 03:24:35 -0600
Received: by solsikke (Postfix, from userid 1004)
        id 3D8BC403C3; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:24:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:24:33 +0100
From: Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new maintainer
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
        tests=none
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

I have taken over in agreement with Ralf. Ralf stays on as
co-maintainer.

Lars.

Reply via email to