On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 04:30:19PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote: > > Please base your package on this (even if you revert to debhelper or > > whatever), and not on -11, as a few policy updates have taken place. > I was going to bring the package to current policy standards anyway; > thanks for doing it for me.. :-) > > As for cdbs, I never used it but I guess this is a good opportunity to > learn...
Ok :) I find cdbs is very convenient for very simple packages like this. I also wanted to split the Debian patch into different patches using cdbs' simple-patchsys.mk, but I never got round to doing so. > > Thanks for taking over! I stopped using wmifs a month ago. > My pleasure! I had considered offering to take over the package some > weeks ago (around the time I took wmclock over) but it seemed pretty > well maintained, so I didn't. I've been using wmifs for years, I > wouldn't like to see it disappear from the archive. Right. I mailed -devel a while back about getting wmifs ITA'ed, and never did because one NM showed interest. He never said anything again, so jsut went ahead the other day during a TODO cleanup :) Besides policy updates, the package doesn't need work: prepare to get one or two bugs every year or so :) Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/~jordi/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
