Hi Martin, Hi Milan, Hi Adam! On 2004-01-29 1:55 +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-29 02:13]: > > Hmmm, funny. Milan P. Stanic has set an ITA some weeks ago. Please see > > BTW, see #225276 for the reason why it was removed.
Hmmm, this is the bug where the removal was requested, but there are no technical reasons why metalog should be removed; only the fact that it was not maintained. Since the latter has changed now: Martin, do you see any reason why metalog shouldn't be uploaded again? IMHO metalog is a nice supplement: for large and complex system you use syslog-ng, for simple environments you take metalog, which is much easier to configure. Besides the standard sysklogd (_this_ is the one which should be removed because of obsolescence :-) ), there are no more loggers in Debian, so I think it is worth the effort. If metalog can be uploaded again, we should reopen all bugs agains it, right? The new version fixes most of them anyway, but it was nice to let users know that the removal was not the final "solution". Thanks for any comments and have a nice day! Martin -- Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
