On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wednesday 03 March 2004 14:32, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > >> Looks like 'apt for the people' to me. I would not really use the apt > >> namespace for that package, and have something that mentions 'packages' > >> in the name, I guess. > >
I'm replying to the part of the thread about the name (I deleted those messages already I'm not confident in my ability to munge the references: following l.d.o. to get it to thread correctly): what about apt-pop?
