Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:06:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line wnpp cleanup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2000 12:35:34 +0000
Received: (qmail 4827 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2000 12:35:33 -0000
Received: from rrzd1.rz.uni-regensburg.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2000 12:35:32 -0000
Received: from rphs1.physik.uni-regensburg.de (rphs1.physik.uni-regensburg.de
[132.199.96.1])
by rrzd1.rz.uni-regensburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3-KLW-Linux-0.1) with ESMTP id
NAA21918;
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:35:13 +0100
Received: from pc6734.physik.uni-regensburg.de by
rphs1.physik.uni-regensburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-SVR4)
id NAA22157; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:38:48 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.4 on Linux
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:38:38 +0100 (CET)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: University of Regensburg
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Stefan Tausendpfund t2069 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: net: nis-utils
Package: net
Version: 20000320
Severity: wishlist
We would like to have NIS+ support (package: nis-utils) in debian.
We are not sure if this is the right place to direct this wish. If not please
forward this message to the appropiate address.
We already submitted a wishlist to base (BUG#59988) and they accepted to
include the necessary PAM and nameservice configuration stuff.
Thanks in advance
Stefan
------------------------------------------------------------
Linux group University Regensburg
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.uni-regensburg.de
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 60791-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2004 12:07:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 05:07:20 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from slider.rack66.net [212.3.252.135] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bx2kK-0007F0-00; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 05:07:20 -0700
Received: by slider.rack66.net (Postfix, from userid 1026)
id 26AA8F2B8; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:06:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:06:25 +0200
From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wnpp cleanup
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Given that:
- This RFP is > 4y old;
- The software is not maintained anymore upstream;
I am closing this request.
People needing this are no worse off than they are now - nothing prevents
them from installing from source. But I doubt anyone who has not yet
installed it will still need this, these days.
Regards,
Filip
--
I have not lost my mind, its backed up on tape somewhere
