Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2004 00:32:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line blub
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2002 18:02:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 31 12:02:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from quechua.inka.de (mail.inka.de) [193.197.184.2] (mail)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18TQil-0005d8-00; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 12:02:31 -0600
Received: from zombie.inka.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) 
        id 18TQik-0007kF-00; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 19:02:30 +0100
Received: from inet by zombie.inka.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 18TQQz-0002sV-00; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:44:09 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: pppoeconf -- configures PPPoE/ADSL
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:43:59 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-31
Severity: normal

I request an adopter for the pppoeconf package.

The package is to adopted ONLY by someone who is familiar with shell
scripting and plans to extend it. It is native Debian package, developed
by me. The needed work is extending it for PPtP/DSL.

The package description is:
 Userfriendly tool for initial configuration of a DSL (PPPoE) connection.

Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zombie 2.4.20-wolk4.0s-pre3 #10 Mon Dez 30 23:14:01 CET 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 174875-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2004 22:32:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 05 15:32:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.5] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1C45Yw-00013t-00; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 15:32:42 -0700
Received: from aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de (aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.3])
        by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i85MWfdA001895
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 00:32:41 +0200
Received: from rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de ([131.246.178.65] 
helo=debian.zombie.inka.de)
        by aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
        (Exim 4.20)
        id 1C45Yu-0009kA-Ud
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 00:32:40 +0200
Received: from inet by debian.zombie.inka.de with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1C45Yu-00045h-9V
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 00:32:40 +0200
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 00:32:40 +0200
From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: blub
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Since no successor w/ enough skills and motivation showed up, I am
closing this to reduce confusion.

-- 
<Joey> hash: Ja, du musst zuerst den Kernel patchen - den Patch musst Du
        selbst entwickeln.

Reply via email to