On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 03:22:01PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-09-22 14:58:24 +0100 Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >[ putting debian-legal on CC ] > > For what end?
Because gnulib is ITPed (#272867), we need to sort out possible legal problems before adding it to Debian, and debian-legal may offer advice. > To me, this looks like you are trolling a list @gnu.org - please be > more precise with your wording on this topic. My current understanding > is that the FSF does not consider "is this documentation also free > software?" to be a sensible question, while many debian developers do. > I agree with the conclusion that it's better to omit them from > discussion for now. Both of us are aware of the issue so it's useless to argue about it. I didn't intend to spawn a discussion on this, but in my report I was listing all the license problems I found in gnulib and I won't hide this from the list as if it didn't exist. I think I was clear enough. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `' http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `-