Your message dated Tue, 2 Nov 2004 04:24:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line please see follow-up to 238451
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2004 16:11:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 24 09:11:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ip249-156.adsl.cliktel.it (chemware.net) [212.45.156.249] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CLkyH-00032p-00; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:11:54 -0700
Received: from andrea by chemware.net with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CLg2B-0001v9-JQ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:55:35 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrea Tasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: I withdraw my ITP since the upstream developer wants to become the 
mantainer
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:55:35 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal


I withdraw my ITP since the upstream developer wants to become the mantainer, 
and he also has already
found a sponsor, while I was still looking for.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux chemware.net 2.6.9-rc3-tun-dragonv #1 SMP Tue Oct 5 02:42:52 CEST 
2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 278067-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2004 03:24:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 01 19:24:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ip249-156.adsl.cliktel.it (chemware.net) [212.45.156.249] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1COpHc-0006U7-00; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:24:32 -0800
Received: from andrea by chemware.net with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1COpHY-0003qZ-LI
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 04:24:28 +0100
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 04:24:28 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: please see follow-up to 238451
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Andrea Tasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Please see follow-up to bug 238451
-- 
Andrea Tasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (http://andrea.tasso.info)
GnuPG key: search for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on
http://www.cam.ac.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
Key fingerprint: 1DD5 98C8 289A C1DF 7CFF  B676 BDB6 6DC9 AD6A 745E

Reply via email to