"Decklin" == Decklin Foster writes: Decklin> The package was generally OK, but had some minor Decklin> issues. Please see -1.1 at
Decklin> http://www.red-bean.com/~decklin/debian/ That's a lesson in getting details right :-) When I filed that RFP bug I'd never expected to find a maintainer or sponsor the same night. In hindsight I should not have rushed this out without going over the cruft, though I know I'd have missed the ChangeLog issue! Decklin> The config.{sub,guess} thing is perhaps still a matter of Decklin> opinion somewhere, but I was of the understanding this Decklin> issue had been resolved. At any rate I am never keen on Decklin> adding ~20k to a .diff.gz unless it actually fixes an Decklin> extant bug. If you have a better reason than "some bloke Decklin> said to do this" I'll listen. I couldn't agree more, and you've actually made me feel much better now that I understand this. The "bloke" was dh_make, and I decided to obey this first time around. I now know to read debian-mentors ..... Thanks, Shyamal