Op ma, 27-12-2004 te 23:25 -0500, schreef Eric Dorland: > * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Op ma, 27-12-2004 te 15:55 -0500, schreef Eric Dorland: > > > I have good contact with the OpenSC upstream. Wouldn't it be > > > beneficial to roll these changes into OpenSC proper? > > > > Absolutely, but I'd think it'd be better if Zetes would pursue this. I > > planned to contact them, but wanted to have a good look at what they > > actually changed before I'd do that. > > Very sensible. If it's not too intrusive and everyone involved agrees, > I don't mind applying patches to the package, so feel free to feed me > some patches to review.
They do introduce an extension to the API... > I'm CCing Andreas (the main OpenSC upstream > developer), please keep him CCed on any replies. Noted. > > I should note, though, that I want to have these packages in Sarge. If > > that means I have to provide a forked OpenSC to be able to do that, then > > that is what I'll do. > > I understand, I'd probably do the same thing if it's expedient. But in > the long term it's probably not desirable. And if you do package a > forked OpenSC, please have it play nice with my own packages :) *g* Of course, that goes without saying ;-) The binary packages that Zetes provides have the modified libopensc.so.1 in them as libbelpic.so.0. If I end up packaging the forked version, it'll do the same thing. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune