Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:57:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please close WNPP bugs properly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2003 11:24:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 12 06:24:24 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19xm2J-0003tb-00; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 06:24:24 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 595D026C9D; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:24:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 7C2B2FEB4; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 21:23:45 +1000 (EST)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 21:23:45 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: preferences -- GNUstep Preferences.app
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-MIA-Summary: Orphaning: preferences
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

The current maintainer of preferences, Frederico S. Munoz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is apparently not active anymore.  Therefore, I
orphan this package now.  If you want to be the new maintainer, please
take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for
detailed instructions how to adopt a package properly.

Some information about this package:

Package: preferences
Binary: preferences
Version: 1.2.99-0.1
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Maintainer: Frederico S. Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), gnustep-gui0-dev (>= 0.7.9), gnustep-back 
(>= 0.7.9)
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.5.6
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/p/preferences
Files: b7bbcb3d85a9226aea44634cf26d34b2 968 preferences_1.2.99-0.1.dsc
 4063ed4dd13629b12a5a675a6a21fa64 196561 preferences_1.2.99.orig.tar.gz
 a3cdbc15dd13d8e43e212e45fa0c973b 2564 preferences_1.2.99-0.1.diff.gz

Package: preferences
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 264
Maintainer: Frederico S. Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.2.99-0.1
Depends: gnustep-back (>= 0.8.0), gnustep-base1, gnustep-gui0 (>= 0.8.0), libc6 
(>= 2.2.4-4), libffcall1, libgmp3 (>= 4.0.1), libobjc1 (>= 1:3.1), libxml2 (>= 
2.4.19-4), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4)
Filename: pool/main/p/preferences/preferences_1.2.99-0.1_i386.deb
Size: 192232
MD5sum: 36870f60cc2790ad482ce24aad251099
Description: GNUstep Preferences.app
 Preferences.app is, functionally, a clone of NeXTstep/OPENSTEP tool of
 the same name. Just like the original program, it's a simple
 application for setting preferences for the GNUstep system, with a
 friendly interface.
 .
 The program is simple, but powerful -- people can create new modules,
 called "bundles", that add new things to the program that its original
 developers did not think of or even intend -- that don't require
 recompiling the main program.

Justification: Open RC bug (>110 days w/o attention), several NMUs in the
past, email bounces

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 210594-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2004 15:57:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 31 07:57:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CkP9F-0002nk-00; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 07:57:05 -0800
Received: from tbm by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CkP9E-0002p5-00; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:57:04 -0700
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:57:04 -0700
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please close WNPP bugs properly
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed" rather than closed properly.  This might
be because your sponsor uploaded the package in a wrong way, or because
your upload was mistakenly recognizes as an NMU.  Please take this into
account in the future, and do close WNPP bugs properly.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply via email to